National Association of Patent Practitioners
NAPP National Association of Patent Practitioners
national association of patent practitioners
patent attorneys patent agents association
patent agent
National Association of Patent Practitioners  
United Sates Patent Attorneys Patent Agents USPTO
NAPP Member Login
Patent Attorneys Patent Agents
Natonal Association of Patent Practitioners

THE DISCLOSURE®
  Newsletter of the National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP®)

Since 1996, An association focused on patent prosecution practice.

May 2007

Natonal Association of Patent Practitioners

FROM THE PRESIDENT ...

Ron Reardon

Just when you thought that practicing patent law had gotten boring, the Four Horseman of patent law reform, final rules on continuations and claim limitations, proposed rule changes to Representation of Others Before the USPTO and KSR v TELEFLEX, came galloping in and got everyone energized.

By now you should be aware that patent reform bills have been introduced in the Congress (click here for the House Bill HR1908 and here for the Senate bill S3818).  NAPP Vice President Sean Brennan is preparing a summary of the proposed changes in these bills for distribution to NAPP’s Government Affairs Committee. 

Patent reform is a highly controversial issue, so expect to see considerable debate on each element being proposed.  Will there be changes made to the bill?  Almost certainly.  Will this be the year that a patent reform bill actually becomes law?  No one knows.

Many practitioners went to full alert when it was announced that the USPTO had submitted two sets of final rules to the Office of Management & Budget for regulatory review:

RIN: 0651-AB93: Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice, and Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims

RIN: 0651-AB94: Changes to Practice for the Examination of Claims in Patent Applications

Practitioner anxiety on the potential impact to their practice is high, mainly because there are no clues, only rumors, as to the content of these final rules.

The subject of assignments has surfaced in the proposed rule changes to Representation of Others Before the USPTO, as the item that has gotten the most comments, primarily concerning patent agents.  Louis Hoffman, NAPP’s Government Affairs Liaison, has asked for comments from NAPP members and has gotten insightful feedback from many of you.

Lastly, with a Supreme Court decision, the suspense surrounding how KSR v TELEFLEX will or will not change the criteria for determining obviousness, is now over.  Click here to read full decision.

Which brings me to my message: come to NAPP’s annual meeting in Las Vegas on July 15-17 for a chance to rub shoulders with William Jenks, USPTO Associate Solicitor, as he presents an update on the Federal Circuit; John Love, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination, as he covers Present & Future Perspectives of the USPTO; and Don Levine, who will give as a peek at future enhancements for EFS-Web.  There is just no substitute for personal contact and interaction with key representatives from the Office.

I look forward to seeing you there.

 
PRACTICE NOTES
US Patent Practice

PTO Implements Changes to Reexamination Procedures

    On April 16, 2007, the PTO expounded the following rules changes, applicable to both inter partes and ex parte reexamination proceedings.

   I: The correspondence address for the patent is now designated as the correct address for all notices, official letters, and other communications for patent owners in an ex parte reexamination or an inter partes reexamination. The filing of reexamination papers has been simplified by providing for the use of ‘‘Mail Stop Ex Parte Reexam’’ for the filing of all ex parte reexamination papers (not just ex parte reexamination requests), other than certain correspondence to the Office of the General Counsel.

II: A patent owner is prohibited from making supplemental responses to an Office action in an inter partes reexamination, without a showing of sufficient cause.

    III: Various miscellaneous clarifications as to the terminology and applicability of the reexamination rules, are also made.

For further information see: Revisions and Technical Corrections Affecting Requirements for Ex Parte and Inter Partes Reexamination: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/notices/72fr18892.pdf

 
 
Teleconferences

Stay tuned for the next NAPP® teleconference which will be scheduled after the Annual Meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada.

 
MEMBER ARTICLES

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may not necessarily be supported by the NAPP, its members, officers, or directors.


The Disclosure® welcomes the submission of articles on topics related to US and foreign patent practice.  To submit  an article to The Disclosure®, please send it as an e-mail attachment to editor@napp.org.


About The Disclosure®

The Disclosure® is a trademark of the National Association of Patent Practitioners.

The Disclosure® is published monthly and is made available to NAPP® members and the general public.

Editor: Peter Giancana

©2007 National Association of Patent Practitioners.  All rights reserved.

NAPP Officers:

President - G. Ron Reardon

Vice President - Sean Brennan

Treasurer - Jerry Miller

Secretary - Michelle Stempien

NAPP Directors:

Sharon Adams

Kevin Grierson

David Grossman

Tom Hamill

Louis Hoffman

AT

ANNUAL MEETING UPDATE

Celebrate NAPP'S 10th Anniversary  - Alexandria, Virginia July 15-18, 2006

The 2007 NAPP® Annual Meeting and Short Course will be held July 14-17, 2007 at the Monte Carlo Resort and Casino in Las Vegas, NV.  For further details click Meeting Info.

 

REGIONAL CHAPTER MEETINGS
Georgia
The next meeting of the Georgia Regional Chapter will be announced in due course.
New Jersey

The New Jersey Regional Chapter needs volunteers to help organize NAPP® regional meetings in the New Jersey area.  If you are interested in volunteering, please contact us.

San Francisco
The next meeting of the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Chapter will be held at 5:30 pm on Wednesday May 16, 2007 at Townsend, Townsend and Crew, LLP, Suite 600, 2175 North California Blvd., San Francisco, CA. The evening's speaker will be Sean Brennan, who will discuss the obviousness standard and the recently decided Supreme Court KSR case.
 
MEMBER BENEFITS
Professional Liability Insurance
Contact Larry Hilton for details at:  925-313-9977.
PCTFILER
Ken Ropke is the contact for the PCTFILER program.  Ken can be reached at: 212-217-9345.
ICO Global Patent Search

The ICO Suite of patent research solutions are available to NAPP® Members at a substantial discount.

Log on to the NAPP® Member Center for more information about any of these programs.

Natonal Association of Patent Practitioners
PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS OF USE | CONTACT US | NEWSLETTER | SITE MAP | ADVERTISING

NAPP • 4680-18-i Monticello Ave., PMB 101 • Williamsburg, VA 23188
Phone: 800-216-9588 • Fax: 757-220-2231
©Copyright 2007 National Association of Patent Practitioners. All rights reserved.